Md. Accelerator Schools To Speed Pupils To Diploma

CAROL’S SUMMARY:
In Baltimore, Maryland, three new accelerator schools have opened this year to helping struggling high school students graduate on time. As the article below reports, the school system has hired a consulting firm, One Bright Ray, which has also successfully established two other alternative schools based in Philadelphia. According to the Alternative Schools Project, funded in 2001 by the US Department of Education, Office of Special Education, there are more than 20,000 alternative schools in operation in the United States.

The ASCD, a national membership organization devoted to school reform, reports the national drop out rate at 1 out of 3 students and almost half for minorities. This means in a classroom of 30 freshmen, 9 will drop out, typically between their freshman and sophomore years. By the time they are 18 years old, only 10 will have the skills necessary to succeed in a job or master college-level work; 4 will be unemployed; 3 will end up on government assistance; and 2 will have no health insurance. Even more dismally, drops outs are eight times more likely to go to jail. When students are asked why they quit school, the majority say “boredom.”

What can educators do to inspire students and help them create a vision for their future?

What else can we do to not only place these students on a trajectory for success but motivate them to persist with their educational and career goals?

What can policy makers and school leaders do to establish student success and transition programs in every school so that students get off to the best start possible?

How can we best prepare students so they’re ready for the world beyond formal education?

We all pay when students don’t learn and achieve at their highest potentials. As educators and parents, we must teach students that they are important and unique and that their impact on the world is priceless.

ARTICLE
AARON MORRISON, Associated Press Writer
BALTIMORE (AP) ― Shane Smith is already two years behind in school. But as he started classes Monday at a new high school, he planned to speed through his freshman and sophomore years in nine months.

That’s a tough order for a 16-year-old who should be in the 11th grade but has struggled academically, in part due to the death of his father when he was a boy.

However, organizers of one of Baltimore’s three new accelerator schools say frequent testing, extracurricular activities and high expectations will get students such as Smith on track and keep them there.

To view entire article visit
http://bit.ly/3iJ4O

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

The Health Care Debate and Your Students

Today’s blog post will follow a somewhat different format – instead of writing about an interesting article of the day, I would like to speak about a topic that has gained a tremendous amount of news coverage in recent weeks: the Obama administration’s health care proposal.

With all of the controversy swirling around this event, young students have doubtless been exposed to a flurry of stories, videos and opinions on their favorite social networking sites.  With every news show come images of vehement pundits and protesters trying to attract public opinion to their point of view.  Knowing that students are struggling to take in and process information picked up through these means, how can you help them make sense of such a hotly debated and politically charged issue?

To me, this is where critical thinking and problem solving skills become especially important.  Teachers should encourage students to research the health care debate and produce relevent (and reputable!) news items and facts about the proposed plan and the current state of our health care system.  Once students have gathered information and have a better understanding of the current state of affairs, ask them to make connections between the facts and ideas that they have gathered.

At this stage, it is especially important to ask students to let go of what they “already know” and form an opinion based on the facts that they have discovered.  Encourage them to ask (and answer!) their own questions.  How many people currently don’t have access to health care?  What will the proposed system cost?  What impact will it have on American citizens?  How can such a plan be implemented? Are there other factors to consider?

Once students have brainstormed about the topic, ask them to each come up with a few ideas on how they, personally, would address the issues facing health care in our country.  Let them collaborate with one another to come up with “alternative” proposals that they can then present to the class.  Allow students to ask questions about the presentations – but only if these questions are respectful and add to the class understanding of the matter.  You can even assign “roles” to students to help them come up with questions (ie doctor, government leader, someone who already has health insurance, someone who is ill, etc.).

By encouraging students to do their own research and interact with the facts at hand, you will allow them not only to build their critical thinking skills, but also to build an informed opinion with which to weigh in on the debate.

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Improving Classroom Standards

Today’s piece is third in a four-part report by the George Lucas Educational Foundation (yes, that George Lucas) that outlines steps to improving public education in the U.S.  The report contends that states should avoid ratcheting down education standards to meet the level of their students – instead, they should move their students’ skill level up by any means necessary.

Especially crucial in today’s article is the mention of college dropout rates.  In New Jersey, more than half of new college students drop out due to the fact that they are not mentally and personally prepared for the challenges that college presents.  With huge numbers of college students needing remedial classes in order to keep up, this statistic raises an important point: are our current educational standards sufficient to create students who are successful in college and their career?

Clearly, educational standards need to incorporate life skills like problem solving, critical thinking, careful decision making, and financial literacy in order to fully prepare students for higher education.  But with so much bandwidth focused on preparing students for tests and raising graduation rates, it is crucial to find ways to empower teachers to achieve these goals.

The movement to create national education standards, while still in its infancy, promises exciting new developments for our public schools.  However, standards can be both a helpful benchmark and also a limiting factor.  In order to adapt to these new standards, educators must develop the flexibility to make them work for the unique needs of their students.  Teachers should avoid simply trying to help students meet standards and pass tests- they should be fostering their own creativity by looking for ways to develop 21st century skills, incorporate technology in their curricula and foster emotionally intelligent students prepared for college, career and life.

Education-Stimulus Priority: Improve Classroom Standards

Several states are modeling innovative efforts to determine what children should learn by the end of their senior year.

by Alexandra R. Moses

States aren’t too far behind the curve when it comes to raising standards. That has been part of No Child Left Behind, and 37 states are matching their standards with college and career demands, according to Achieve, a nonprofit group that works with states on standards. And though each state gets to set its own standards, there are some common guidelines for what students should know to be successful after high school.

The Administration’s Requirement

States need tougher guidelines for what students should know in subjects such as math, science, language arts, and history at specific points in their education. That means tougher classes, a broader list of courses, and strengthened graduation requirements.

But the Obama administration also wants all students to be ready for college. For states, that means closing gaps in achievement and making sure English-language learners and special education and low-income students have the same access to education as middle-class and upper-class college-bound kids.

How It Might Look

Federal standards don’t exist, but there’s a push to create a common core of standards that all states could use, says Scott Montgomery of the Council of Chief State School Officers. ACT, the College Board, and Achieve are collaborating on that common core of standards and hope to have much of it done this year, he says.

One recommendation for improving standards includes assessing how well state’s college-prep classes actually prepare students for college. States need to be specific about what’s required. For instance, instead of asking kids to take three years of math, state standards should specify courses such as algebra, geometry, and algebra II, according to the American Diplomacy Project, which works on college readiness.

To help close achievement gaps, schools also need to make accommodations for different learning styles. That might mean longer school days or new curricula that weave reading lessons into all subjects.

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Teaching: The New Job of Choice for Career Switchers?

Today’s Washington Post article describes how many employees who have chosen or been forced to find new jobs are seeking employment as teachers.   While some contend that these new teachers will be in over their head, they bring valuable job experience and subject matter expertise to the classroom.  In fact, these newly-minted educators can have a profound impact on education – especially if they focus on the following:

  •  Preparing students for the world of work:  Educators that were recently employed by corporate America have a valuable perpective on what employers look for in new hires.  These insights are valuable to students at every level of education, no matter what their career dreams are.  The earlier we start preparing our students with solid networking skills, an entrepreneurial spirit and an understanding of how to succeed in the world of work, the better.
  • Bringing professional development to the classroom: Many companies promote valuable leadership frameworks, 360 degree feedback reviews and strengths-based assessments for their employees.  Imagine the impact of teaching students to evaluate their actions based on the framework provided by Kouzes and Posner in The Leadership Challenge, or asking them to analyze a company based on the Good to Great model.  Students would certainly benefit a great deal by receiving regular feedback from their teachers and classmates on their attitude, their commitment to excellence and their leadership behavior.
  • A sense of humility: Following the economic shake-up of the past year, many individuals impacted by layoffs, bankruptcies and other setbacks can communicate a valuable message to students.  These new teachers can help students avoid a sense of entitlement, learn how to make themselves irreplaceable in their internships and extracurricular activities and encourage them to evaluate how to make their future employers stronger and more recession-proof.

Business Is Brisk for Teacher Training Alternatives

By Michael Alison Chandler

Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 31, 2009

The high unemployment rate has provided an unexpected boon for the nation’s public schools: legions of career-switchers eager to become teachers.

Across the country, interest in teacher preparation programs geared toward job-changers is rising sharply. Applications to a national retraining program based in 20 cities rose 30 percent this year. Enrollment in a career-switcher program for teachers at Virginia’s community colleges increased by 20 percent. And a Prince George’s County resident teacher program increased enrollment by 40 percent.

In many places, there are more converts to teaching than there are jobs, except in hard-to-fill posts in science, math and special education classes. But the wave of applicants might ease teacher shortages expected to develop as 1.7 million baby boomers retire from the public schools during the next decade.

The newcomers come with a host of unknowns, including how much training they will need before they can handle a classroom full of rowdy or reluctant students and whether they are likely to stay in a profession that is struggling with low retention rates.

About one-third of new teachers graduate from 600 so-called alternative certification programs developed to bring people with no education background into classrooms. The programs vary widely, including two-year graduate degrees and online courses. President Obama (D) is proposing to devote more than $100 million in his 2010 budget to programs that recruit and train skilled mid-career professionals, particularly in poor schools and math and science classes.

Some alternative programs have proven to be “excellent recruitment engines,” said Sharon Robinson, president of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. But training must continue to be retooled, she said, so new teachers are not put “in the deep end of the pool” right away. “It’s not fair to them and certainly not fair to the students they encounter,” she said.

Career-changers are considered desirable because they bring maturity and outside experiences into classrooms. They also help solve a perennial problem in public education, particularly in math and science: Too few teachers have a solid grasp of the subject they teach.

Read more…

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Technology and 21st Century Student Engagement

Results from a few pilots show that technology in the classroom has a significant effect on student engagement, active learning and the connection between class work and real-world applications.  In North Carolina, the state funded a pilot of technology-based teaching at Greene Central High.  Before the program, students went to college at the rate of 26%.   Now, after the program has been in place for a few years, the rate of college-placed seniors is 94%.   The school has other strategies in place to augment student success, but the principal credit the emphasis on technology as huge driver of these marked outcomes.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Students Rap Their Way to Achievement, Global Awareness

Back in 2008, students at the Ron Clark Academy became overnight celebrities after their politically-themed rendition of T.I.’s “Whatever You Like” attracted milliions of views on YouTube.  The students, who penned the song “You Can Vote However You Like” to emphasize that voters should choose a candidate based on their political opinions and not on their race, were famous for their singing, dancing and rhyming skills.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Department of Education Stresses Job Skills

Today’s article discusses the link between education policy and the skills needed for a successful career.  As Martha Kanter clearly knows, students are too often allowed to leave school without the necessary emotional, social and practical tools to be effective in the world of work.  The sweeping movement towards educational standards in the United States must include skills and metrics that stretch far beyond test scores and graduation rates – and Kanter’s efforts to link labor and education are a step in the right direction.

 In order to be successful, students need critical thinking skills, an awareness of their gifts and talents, the emotional intelligence to build up a network of supporters and the internal motivation and maturity to make a positive impact both in the classroom and in the workplace.  LifeBound’s Critical and Creative Thinking for Teenagers helps students develop all of these skills through the lens of medicine, nature, entrepreneurship and other core subjects.  Learn more here: http://lifebound.com/lifebound-books/critical_creative_thinking.html

Job Training Is Stressed at Education Dept., State Leaders Are Told

By SARA HEBEL
Santa Fe
, N.M.

Martha J. Kanter, the U.S. under secretary of education, told state higher-education leaders gathered here on Wednesday for their annual meeting that she would make improving job training a priority.

 

She said she wanted to better align federal education and labor programs that often operate in isolation from one another even though they have complementary goals of preparing people for the work force.

 

“I really want to marry work and education in a more systematic way,” Ms. Kanter said. More than half of the nation’s college students work while they are enrolled, she said, and federal policy does not do enough to make sure they can effectively balance work and study.

 

Ms. Kanter spoke to the State Higher Education Executive Officers’ meeting on her 15th day in office. In those first few weeks, she said, she had already met three times with officials at the Department of Labor. Today she and Jane Oates, the Labor Department’s assistant secretary for employment and training administration, will appear together before a Senate subcommittee on employment and work-force safety to discuss their priorities for revamping the Workforce Investment Act, which provides money for job training at community colleges and elsewhere.

 

As an example of the disconnect in the current system, Ms. Kanter cited a federal youth-employment program. She said money was distributed through local Workforce Investment Boards without any emphasis to program recipients that they should continue their education to improve their long-term job prospects.

 

State officials praised Ms. Kanter’s remarks.

 

Jack R. Warner, executive director and chief executive of the South Dakota Board of Regents, told Ms. Kanter he was “very pleased to hear” that she planned to push for better coordination and alignment in job-training programs. “I really find a disjunction there,” Mr. Warner said. “Higher education needs to play a stronger role” in such training.

 

The question of how state and federal governments should help working students came up at a conference session about rethinking student aid. Sandy Baum, senior policy analyst for the College Board, said that one needed public-policy conversation was how to best allocate financial aid to adult students. The central question for many students is not how they are going to be able to pay tuition itself—the focus of much current student-aid policy—but how they can afford to pay basic living expenses while classes and study are preventing them from working as many hours as they could, Ms. Baum said.

 

Global Competition

 

On the issue of global competition, Ms. Kanter reiterated the Obama administration’s goal of stepping up American performance so that the United States is atop the world by 2020 in the proportion of residents who hold a degree or certificate. She said her recent conversations at the 2009 World Conference on Higher Education, held by Unesco in Paris last week, had given her ideas for how the United States might improve and made her concerned about how the country could slip behind.

 

Canada’s experience, she said, showed that an emphasis on helping colleges, students, and others adopt best practices—rather than putting a focus on accountability alone—could foster rapid improvement in student success. Her talks with Chinese officials demonstrated how actively other countries were also seeking to move up, she said.

 

During a question-and-answer period following her speech, Ms. Kanter fielded a question about whether the federal government should make at least some education beyond high school available to everyone.

 

Ann E. Daley, executive director of the Washington Higher Education Coordinating Board, asked whether the Obama administration had considered a new financing model for higher education, in which the concept of the government’s providing everyone with a public education through the 12th grade would be extended to at least a 13th year.

 

Ms. Kanter said the idea was “certainly worth looking at,” although she did not know whether it was something administration officials were specifically considering.

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Top-Scoring Nations Share Strategies on Teachers

CAROL’S SUMMARY
Yesterday at the Global Education Competitiveness Summit, American officials explored what they could learn from the best-practices of the highest performing countries from around the world. Two examples, from Singapore and Finland, top the list. While these nations achieve their high performing status in different ways, as the article below indicates, both have very high standards for teachers. In both cases, teachers need master’s degree, are part of a professional and societal “elite”, and receive many hours of professional development and career track challenge.

What if we start to look closely at why so many new teachers drop out in the first five years of teaching? What if we had much more of a rigorous filter for students who want to become teachers in the U.S? What if we emphasized overall critical thinking and problem-solving strategies and cultivated a culture of future teachers who embrace rigor and challenge? What if we rebuilt the curriculum emphasized in most schools of education, which is arguably not meeting the needs of today’s students or young teachers? What if we imported some of the teachers from the world’s highest performing nations to help us make these kinds of changes on the ground level?

In addition to the educational performance success of countries like Finland and the city-state of Singapore, it is important to also ask:

1) what is the unemployment rate in these countries?

2) How many citizens have health care?

3) What is the crime rate?

4) How many citizens are in prison?

5) What are the taxes?

6) What emphasis does the society as a whole place on education?

Surely, for the United States to radically change educational outcomes and compete for the 21st century, some of these other societal areas will need to be dealt with and improved simultaneously. A healthy, vital nation has a far greater chance of having strong teachers with world-class graduates than a nation that is tapped out, unhealthy, uninsured and in many areas, impoverished. We can and should work on each of these fronts for long term gain.

ARTICLE
Education Week
By Sean Cavanagh
American education officials trying to learn from the policies and practices of top-performing nations seem to have two exemplary models in Singapore and Finland.

Yet in some respects, those two nations have risen to the top in very different ways.

That was one of the lessons that emerged yesterday at what was billed as the Global Education Competitiveness Summit, which brought state officials and business leaders together here to discuss lessons from high-achieving countries that could be applied to U.S. school systems—an omnipresent theme in American education circles these days.

To view the entire article visit
http://bit.ly/FVxc1

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

No Dropouts From This Camden, NJ, High School

CAROL’S SUMMARY
“I don’t like work, no one does. But I like what is in work—the chance to find yourself.”
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness

Students at MetEast High School in Camden, New Jersey are beating the inner-city success odds by studying their passions, giving and receiving peer feedback and making presentations to students and adults four times a year. MetEast is one of sixty schools nationwide designed to help students figure out their interests and abilities, linking those to careers, colleges and fields of interest. This initiative is made possible by Big Picture Learning, which is a non-profit which works with “advisors” instead of “teachers” who coach, motivate and hold accountable their students whom they work with closely for four years.

Students learn follow-through, a crucial life skill. Angelo Drummond, a MetEast student, has come to know and value himself better by committing himself to improving his SAT scores for college. He is proud that for the first time in his life he has learned to be a finisher. That follow through will help succeed wherever his gifts and talents may take him.

Every student can be exposed to this important personal perspective through a LifeBound book called, Gifts and Talents for Teenagers. This book helps students figure out what they are good at so that they can develop follow-through, discipline and self-mastery. No matter what field they decide to pursue, they will need a quality mindset, an attitude of respect and the ability to be accountable to the highest authority who impacts their lives—themselves.

ARTICLE
Chronicle of Higher Education
By GOLDIE BLUMENSTYK

The best piece of college marketing this year is a television ad that could easily be taken as a fingers-flapping, thumb at the nose to centuries of higher-education tradition.

It’s the Kaplan University spot that starts off showing a pensive-looking “professor” in the well of a wood-paneled lecture hall intoning to his students: “The system has failed you. I have failed you.”

To view the entire article
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v55/i40/40financialaffairs.htm

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

As Fiscal Year Ends, Big Questions Loom for Colleges’ Financial Futures

CAROL’S SUMMARY
More than 40 states made mid-year cuts totaling nearly $60 billion according to the Center on Budget and Policy. July 1st begins a new fiscal year and, while fiscal year-end numbers are only one measure of overall stability, it is one people scrutinize and often value the most. If the value dips too low relative to debt load, bondholders could declare the institution in default and demand payment. The high unemployment rate and low personal revenues from income taxes make this situation even worse. All but two states increased their unemployment rates in May. State personal income tax in May was 20% lower than the same period last year.

This may mean that incoming freshmen this year might face a reduction in many services they need to succeed. If these patterns continue, it will be even more important for high schools to prepare students well for college and the world of work. Students themselves will need to have a lot more initiative and personal responsibility to find the help they need at college or within the community. They need to realize that the current economic climate makes getting a college degree more important than ever and that the costs of dropping out may be higher than ever. High schools can start early to communicate that message in ways that are positive, proactive and empowering.

ARTICLE
Chronicle of Higher Education
By GOLDIE BLUMENSTYK

Will the stock market close on a high note tomorrow, the last day of the fiscal year for most colleges? Will that last big gift come in before the books close?

As always, the answers could help determine whether some colleges will face demands to pay off their debt faster than planned or be subjected to extra monitoring by the U.S. Department of Education. Others might encounter more scrutiny from their accreditors, or pay higher rates of interest when they borrow cash to cover day-to-day expenses.

To view entire article visit
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v55/i40/40june.htm

Share this Article with Your Friends:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
Email Newsletters with Constant Contact